The author of the blog I am following talks about how Obama won the debate and emerged as a canidate who was knowledgeable and unflappable toward McCain on Foreign Policy. He says that Obama is better suited to deal with the foreign crisis and our economic hardships now. The author then goes into saying that McCain won the debate on other certain situations. He says that McCain earned a slight victory but nothing in the debate was a knockout blow. He also states the way each one of the debaters showed different qualities of how they each mastered their parts of the debate.
I think that some of the questions and answers i found interesting were about the financial situation that is going on in our country right now. The reason i found this so interesting is because there was really not much time to figure out how to answer these, this is a topic is so new that it had to come from the heart and had to be a real honest answer of how to fix this.
I thought the media covered the debate the way it normally does with the focus on the two debaters and the moderator. I would have liked to see more shots of the crowd just to see how they were reacting to questions and answers. I don't really think there were any opportunities missed by the media or the candidates, I think overall it was a good debate but it was tough for me to chose my winner.
The article that I would have my argument gaged to is By Klein called "Obama wins debate on tactics and strategies." My argument is that I believe that Klein flip flops too much on who he thinks won the debate. He has arguments for both and makes them both pretty strong. I think he needs to set himself to one idea and one decision and go with that.
1 comment:
I agree with a lot of the points you made in your blog, such as the eye contact thing which i also noticed and an important question being based on the financial crisis. I also agree with the author of the blog you're following which states they think Obama won. Overall good job.
Post a Comment